INTC vs PG: Which Is the Better Buy?
Side-by-side comparison of Intel Corp. and The Procter & Gamble Company — fair value, conviction, valuation metrics, and QuantHub research signals.
Updated 2026-07-15.
Intel Corp. · Technology
$107.76
-5.2% upside to fair value
Grade D
VS
The Procter & Gamble Company · Consumer Defensive
$150.38
+10.0% upside to fair value
Grade B
High Quality
QuantHub Verdict
PG has more upside to fair value
(+10.0%).
These are model outputs — not personalized investment advice.
See all research →
Valuation & Fundamentals
| Metric |
INTC |
PG |
| Current Price |
$107.76 |
$150.38 |
| Fair Value Estimate |
$102.16 |
$165.39 |
| Upside to Fair Value |
-5.2%
|
+10.0%
|
| Market Cap |
$541.6B |
$350.2B |
| Forward P/E |
-173.8x
|
21.5x
|
| EV / EBITDA |
49.9x
|
15.1x
|
| Price / Sales |
10.1x
|
4.0x
|
| Price / FCF |
-173.7x
|
23.3x
|
| Revenue Growth YoY |
+7.2%
|
+7.4%
|
| Gross Margin |
35.4%
|
50.3%
|
| Operating Margin |
-9.4%
|
23.2%
|
| Return on Equity |
-3.0%
|
31.3%
|
| Dividend Yield |
0% |
0% |
| FCF Yield |
—
|
4.29%
|
| Analyst Consensus |
Hold
|
Buy
|
Investment Thesis
Intel Corporation is a leading semiconductor company operating in the technology sector, specializing in designing and manufacturing microprocessors and related technologies. The business quality is currently low due to negative earnings growth of 354.1% in the most recent quarter and negative profitability metrics including a net margin of -5.9% and an operating margin of -9.4%. Despite a revenu…
The Procter & Gamble Company is a leading global consumer defensive company specializing in household and personal products with a strong portfolio across fabric care, baby and family care, beauty, health care, and grooming. The business quality is high, supported by a durable competitive moat from strong brands, consistent earnings growth, and prudent capital allocation emphasizing dividends and…
Accumulation Zones
| Metric |
INTC |
PG |
| Zone Low |
$76.62 |
$124.04 |
| Zone High |
$86.84 |
$140.58 |
| In Buy Zone? |
No
|
No
|