COP vs RTX: Which Is the Better Buy?
Side-by-side comparison of ConocoPhillips and RTX Corporation — fair value, conviction, valuation metrics, and QuantHub research signals.
Updated 2026-05-04.
ConocoPhillips · Energy
$125.78
+7.3% upside to fair value
Grade C
VS
RTX Corporation · Industrials
$172.90
-21.3% upside to fair value
Grade D
QuantHub Verdict
COP has more upside to fair value
(+7.3%).
COP trades at a lower forward P/E
(21.0x).
These are model outputs — not personalized investment advice.
See all research →
Valuation & Fundamentals
| Metric |
COP |
RTX |
| Current Price |
$125.78 |
$172.90 |
| Fair Value Estimate |
$134.90 |
$136.05 |
| Upside to Fair Value |
+7.3%
|
-21.3%
|
| Market Cap |
$153.3B |
$232.8B |
| Forward P/E |
21.0x
|
32.1x
|
| EV / EBITDA |
7.5x
|
19.2x
|
| Price / Sales |
2.6x
|
2.6x
|
| Price / FCF |
8.4x
|
27.9x
|
| Revenue Growth YoY |
-2.5%
|
+8.7%
|
| Gross Margin |
33.1%
|
20.2%
|
| Operating Margin |
25.4%
|
10.4%
|
| Return on Equity |
11.3%
|
11.2%
|
| Dividend Yield |
0% |
0% |
| FCF Yield |
11.96%
|
3.59%
|
| Analyst Consensus |
Strong Buy
|
Buy
|
Investment Thesis
ConocoPhillips is a leading independent oil and gas exploration and production company with a strong focus on low-cost shale assets and sustainability initiatives. The company benefits from a durable competitive position due to its cost advantage and early ESG leadership, but faces near-term earnings pressure as revenue declined 2.5% and earnings fell 23.4% in the most recent quarter year-over-ye…
RTX Corporation is a leading aerospace and defense company with a diversified portfolio spanning Pratt & Whitney jet engines, Collins Aerospace avionics, and Raytheon Intelligence & Space defense systems. The company benefits from a strong competitive moat supported by a $271 billion backlog and multi-year contracts, driving consistent revenue growth of 10% in 2025 and 9% in Q1 2026. Earnings gro…
Accumulation Zones
| Metric |
COP |
RTX |
| Zone Low |
$101.18 |
$102.04 |
| Zone High |
$114.67 |
$115.64 |
| In Buy Zone? |
No
|
No
|