COP vs RTX: Which Is the Better Buy?
Side-by-side comparison of ConocoPhillips and RTX Corporation — fair value, conviction, valuation metrics, and QuantHub research signals.
Updated 2026-07-08.
ConocoPhillips · Energy
$108.44
-21.6% upside to fair value
Grade D
VS
RTX Corporation · Industrials
$185.60
-25.2% upside to fair value
Grade D
QuantHub Verdict
COP has more upside to fair value
(-21.6%).
COP trades at a lower forward P/E
(18.4x).
These are model outputs — not personalized investment advice.
See all research →
Valuation & Fundamentals
| Metric |
COP |
RTX |
| Current Price |
$108.44 |
$185.60 |
| Fair Value Estimate |
$85.04 |
$138.81 |
| Upside to Fair Value |
-21.6%
|
-25.2%
|
| Market Cap |
$132.1B |
$249.9B |
| Forward P/E |
18.4x
|
34.3x
|
| EV / EBITDA |
6.1x
|
18.3x
|
| Price / Sales |
2.3x
|
2.8x
|
| Price / FCF |
8.6x
|
29.9x
|
| Revenue Growth YoY |
-2.5%
|
+8.7%
|
| Gross Margin |
29.2%
|
20.2%
|
| Operating Margin |
18.3%
|
10.9%
|
| Return on Equity |
11.3%
|
11.2%
|
| Dividend Yield |
0% |
0% |
| FCF Yield |
11.64%
|
3.34%
|
| Analyst Consensus |
Strong Buy
|
Buy
|
Investment Thesis
ConocoPhillips is a major player in the Energy sector focused on Oil & Gas Exploration & Production. The company demonstrates medium business quality with a stable competitive position but faces earnings pressure as reflected in a 23.4% decline in earnings and a 2.5% decline in revenue in the most recent quarter year-over-year. Despite a solid ROE of 11.3% and attractive margins (gross margin 29.…
RTX Corporation is a leading aerospace and defense company with a strong competitive moat driven by scale and an installed base in commercial aerospace via Pratt & Whitney and Collins Aerospace, and defense through Raytheon. The company benefits from a large multi-year backlog of approximately $270 billion supporting steady cash flow and mid-single-digit organic growth. Despite solid revenue grow…
Accumulation Zones
| Metric |
COP |
RTX |
| Zone Low |
$63.78 |
$104.11 |
| Zone High |
$72.28 |
$117.99 |
| In Buy Zone? |
No
|
No
|