AAPL vs INTC: Which Is the Better Buy?
Side-by-side comparison of Apple Inc. and Intel Corporation — fair value, conviction, valuation metrics, and QuantHub research signals.
Updated 2026-04-16.
Apple Inc. · Technology
$260.88
+135.9% upside to fair value
Grade B
High Quality
VS
Intel Corporation · Technology
$68.50
-13.9% upside to fair value
High Conviction
Grade D
QuantHub Verdict
AAPL has more upside to fair value
(+135.9%).
These are model outputs — not personalized investment advice.
See all research →
Valuation & Fundamentals
| Metric |
AAPL |
INTC |
| Current Price |
$260.88 |
$68.50 |
| Fair Value Estimate |
$615.48 |
$59.00 |
| Upside to Fair Value |
+135.9%
|
-13.9%
|
| Market Cap |
$3,834.4B |
$343.9B |
| Forward P/E |
32.6x
|
-1245.8x
|
| EV / EBITDA |
25.4x
|
—
|
| Price / Sales |
8.8x
|
6.5x
|
| Price / FCF |
31.1x
|
-69.5x
|
| Revenue Growth YoY |
+40.3%
|
+0.2%
|
| Gross Margin |
47.3%
|
34.8%
|
| Operating Margin |
32.4%
|
-4.2%
|
| Return on Equity |
159.9%
|
-0.3%
|
| Dividend Yield |
0% |
— |
| FCF Yield |
3.21%
|
—
|
| Analyst Consensus |
Strong Buy
|
Hold
|
Investment Thesis
Apple Inc. is a leading technology company specializing in consumer electronics, software, and services with a strong brand and durable competitive advantages. The business quality is high, demonstrated by exceptional profitability metrics including a 159.9% return on equity, 40.3% revenue growth year-over-year, and 53.3% earnings growth year-over-year. Despite these fundamentals, the stock is cu…
Intel is a legacy semiconductor leader attempting an ambitious turnaround under new CEO Lip-Bu Tan, pivoting from a pure-play chipmaker to an integrated device manufacturer (IDM 2.0) with foundry ambitions. The business remains structurally challenged: PC market share is eroding, foundry execution is unproven, negative free cash flow persists, and margins are compressed. However, the stock trades…
Accumulation Zones
| Metric |
AAPL |
INTC |
| Zone Low |
$461.61 |
$44.00 |
| Zone High |
$523.16 |
$50.00 |
| In Buy Zone? |
Yes
|
No
|